<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gore &#8216;Inconvenient Truth&#8217; Film Contains Nine Factual Errors, UK court decision finds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scanlyze.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/gore-inconvenient-truth-film-contains-nine-factual-errors-uk-court-decision-finds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scanlyze.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/gore-inconvenient-truth-film-contains-nine-factual-errors-uk-court-decision-finds/</link>
	<description>The Online Journal of Insight, Satire, Desire, Wit and Observation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 03:57:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Christensen</title>
		<link>http://scanlyze.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/gore-inconvenient-truth-film-contains-nine-factual-errors-uk-court-decision-finds/#comment-7543</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Christensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 20:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scanlyze.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/gore-inconvenient-truth-film-contains-nine-factual-errors-uk-court-decision-finds/#comment-7543</guid>
		<description>In an effort to further understand the truth of this subject, I attended a technical conference on climate change, held from March 2 through 4th in New York City.  It was attended by over 300 engineers and scientists, all interested in the subject from a professional standpoint.
Over 100 related paper were presented.  Numerous PhD&#039;s and Professional Engineers participated in the discussions.  The overwhelming evidence is against such a phenomenon ever having taken place.  Although we seem to have 400 thousand years of interpretive data from glaciers, and about 500 years crude data from tree rings, the Earth&#039;s age is estimated to be in excess of 5 billion years.  So our oldest data is relatively recent, and conclusively uncertain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an effort to further understand the truth of this subject, I attended a technical conference on climate change, held from March 2 through 4th in New York City.  It was attended by over 300 engineers and scientists, all interested in the subject from a professional standpoint.<br />
Over 100 related paper were presented.  Numerous PhD&#8217;s and Professional Engineers participated in the discussions.  The overwhelming evidence is against such a phenomenon ever having taken place.  Although we seem to have 400 thousand years of interpretive data from glaciers, and about 500 years crude data from tree rings, the Earth&#8217;s age is estimated to be in excess of 5 billion years.  So our oldest data is relatively recent, and conclusively uncertain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
